When I find acceptable answer or Metalink document about this problem I'll post info here just for reminder.
Info:
OS: SunOS
DB: Oracle 9.2.0.6.0
undo_management=AUTO
undo_retention=14400
undo-size = 2GB
Usage of our UNDOTBS1 tablespace raised to 100% and I've decided to free some undo space because ORA-01555 errors started to show up.
To free some space I've tried to find transactions that were using undo blocks and commit or rollback those transactions.
But when I queried:
select t.used_ublk, t.* from v$transaction t order by t.used_ublk desc;
there were transactions with just few blocks used - UNDOTBS1 tablespace was 2 GB large.
So to avoid ORA-01555 errors I've created another undo tablespace UNDOTBS2 and made that tbs as default.
CREATE UNDO TABLESPACE UNDOTBS2 DATAFILE '/ora/oradata/undotbs02.dbf' SIZE 2048M REUSE AUTOEXTEND OFF; alter system set undo_tablespace=UNDOTBS2 scope=both;
Then I could without pressure examine what happened.
I queried DBA_UNDO_EXTENTS and found out that there were lots of undo segments situated in UNDOTBS1 tablespace.
select segment_name, owner, tablespace_name, status from dba_rollback_segs; SEGMENT_NAME OWNER TABLESPACE_NAME STATUS SYSTEM SYS SYSTEM ONLINE _SYSSMU1$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU2$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU3$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU4$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU5$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU6$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU7$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU8$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU9$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU10$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU11$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU12$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU13$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU14$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU15$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU16$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU17$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU18$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU19$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU20$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU21$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU22$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU23$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU24$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU25$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU26$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU27$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU28$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU29$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU30$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU31$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU32$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU33$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU34$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU35$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU36$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU37$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU38$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU39$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU40$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU41$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU42$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU43$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU44$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS1 OFFLINE _SYSSMU45$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS2 ONLINE _SYSSMU46$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS2 ONLINE _SYSSMU47$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS2 ONLINE _SYSSMU48$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS2 ONLINE _SYSSMU49$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS2 ONLINE _SYSSMU50$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS2 ONLINE _SYSSMU51$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS2 ONLINE _SYSSMU52$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS2 ONLINE _SYSSMU53$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS2 ONLINE _SYSSMU54$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS2 ONLINE _SYSSMU55$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS2 ONLINE _SYSSMU56$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS2 ONLINE _SYSSMU57$ PUBLIC UNDOTBS2 ONLINE
Only offline rollback segments in UNDOTBS1 tablespace.
How come that this UNDOTBS1 tablespace was used 100% but when I tried to find transactions which were using that undo/rollback segments I couldn't find none.
I understand that there was transaction/transactions that eventually used whole UNDO tablespace, but they finished with their work - commit or rollback was executed.
This allocated UNDO space should be reused by another transactions - but insted of reusing UNDO space I got several:
ORA-01555 caused by SQL statement below (Query Duration=78 sec, SCN: 0x0004.f253ce76):
This was production database so I recreated UNDO tablespace as it was before. I've dropped UNDOTBS1 and created new one on the same location. Also made id as a default undo tablespace. After that dropped newly created UNDOTBS2.
I think that this was Oracle bug but still I am eager to find metalink document that confirms my thoughts.
Link on OTN forum: Click here!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment